1.   Winning the King Abdullah II Award for Excellence for Private Sector is considered a major achievement for the winning organization, and recognition of its effective and efficient performance, in addition to considering the winning organization as a role model.

2.   The winning organizations receive the trophy of the King Abdullah II Award for Excellence for Private Sector and a certificate of appreciation, which is considered an incentive and an honor for the winning organization for being the excellent and most efficient organization in its sector. The results are announced during a big ceremony held under the Royal Patronage.

3.   The winning organization may use the Award’s logo – set by the Center – on its publications for a period of one cycle from receiving the Award.  The organization may also announce and promote its achievement.

4.   After announcing the results, each organization participating in the Award receives an assessment report based on the Award’s criteria clarifying its strengths and areas for improvement, to help it achieve continuous improvement on its performance.

5.   The winning organization receives differential treatment from the Jordan Institution of Standards and Metrology, Jordan Customs Department, Jordan Enterprise (JEDCO) and Government Tenders Directorate

6.   The King Abdullah II Center for Excellence publishes the success stories of the winning organization on the websites of both the Center and the Award with the aim of sharing the winning organizations' knowledge, promoting the Award’s benefits and publicizing their achievement.

7.   The winning organizations present their success stories and share them with other organizations through the Award related training courses, awareness sessions, and relevant conferences. The winning organization may also preserve the confidentiality of information they do not want to publicize.

8.   By adopting the excellence criteria and international best practices, organizations participating in Award benefit in developing their internal systems which ultimately has a positive impact on their performance.  They also benefit from these criteria in the self-assessment process which aims to determine the organization’s strengths and areas for improvement.

9.   In each Award category, there is only one winning organization that receives the Award, while the second in place receives the “Seal of Excellence” certificate, and the third in place receives the Mark of “Best Practice” certificate.

1.      Winning the King Abdullah II Award for Excellence in Government Performance and Transparency is considered a major achievement for the winning organization, and a recognition of its effective and efficient performance, in addition to considering the winning organization as a role model.

2.      The winning organizations receive the trophy of the King Abdullah II Award for Excellence in Government Performance and Transparency and a certificate of appreciation, which is considered a motivation for the winning organization for being the excellent and most efficient organization in its category. The results are announced at a big ceremony held under the Royal Patronage.

3.      The winning ministry/organization may use the Award’s logo – set by the Center – on its publications and website for a period of one cycle from receiving the Award.  The organization may also announce and promote its achievement.

4.      After announcing the results, each participating ministry/organization receives an assessment report based on the Award’s criteria clarifying its strengths and areas for improvement, to help it achieve continuous improvement on its performance.

5.      The Employee who wins the Distinguished Government Employee Award, is considered a role model among public sector employees and receives the Award in recognition of his excellent performance and efficiency.

6.      The Employee who wins the Distinguished Government Employee Award receives the trophy of the Award and a certificate of appreciation and a financial reward.

7.      After announcing the results, each employee who was eligible for the personal interview receives an assessment report clarifying the strengths and areas for improvement, to help him achieve continuous improvement on his performance.

1.      The participating organization answers the Award’s criteria and submits the participation report, along with the supporting documents, to the Center.

2.      Members of the Assessors Panel are appointed by the Center’s Board of Trustees after they have completed a specialized training course conducted by the Center.

3.      The assessment process of each organization is conducted by a team from members of the Assessors Panel formed by the Center.

4.      Each member of the assessment team studies the organization’s report separately.  Each member then submits an independent report about each organization, which includes strengths, areas for improvement, and issues to be addressed  during the site visit.  The outcomes of the independent  report are then placed in the points calculating schedule specifically designed for this purpose.

5.      The assessment team gets together to reach a common understanding about the status of the organization.  A consensus report is then prepared indicating the strengths, areas for improvement, and issues to be addressed during the site visit.  The assessment team subsequently places the outcomes of the consensus report in the points calculating schedule specifically designed for this purpose.

6.      The team conducts a site visit to the organization in order to verify what was stated in the participation report, as well as to formulate a clearer and more comprehensive view about the organization.

7.      Following the field visit, the team prepares the final report about the organization, basically determining the strengths and areas for improvement and highlighting the assessment results and scores, which were calculated after the outcomes of the final report are placed in the points calculating schedule designed specifically for this purpose.

8.      The Center forms a specialized committee to discuss the reports of the finalists of the assessment process, the mystery shopper, the customer satisfaction and the employee satisfaction, for the organizations competing to win the King Abdullah II Award for Excellence in Government Performance and Transparency

9.      The Steering Committee recommends to the Board of Trustees the organizations to win the Award

10.   The Board of Trustees decides on the names of the winning organizations of the King Abdullah II Award for Excellence in Government Performance and Transparency

11.   Following the announcement of the results, each participating organization receives an assessment report based on the Award’s criteria clarifying its strengths and areas for improvement in order to continue improving its performance.